One of the most pivotal decisions an organisation faces when relocating to a new office, or refurbishing an existing one, is selecting the appropriate procurement method. This choice can significantly impact the project’s overall cost, duration, and quality. With various routes available, the dilemma often boils down to two primary contenders: Design & Build (D&B) and the Traditional Route. Each method carries its own set of advantages and potential pitfalls, making the decision far from straightforward.
This article looks at the intrinsic differences between these two office fit out methodologies and the distinct benefits they offer. By providing a clear and comprehensive comparison, we aim to equip companies with the knowledge necessary to make informed choices that align with their specific project requirements and strategic objectives.